A&S Learning Design & Technology Knowledge Base

Feature Comparison: Zoom vs. Microsoft Teams

Updated on

When choosing your tools, remember that the best tool for your course is generally

  • What you and your students are most familiar with.
  • What ensures all students have a way to participate.
  • What's doable.
  • What's supported by the university (you're going to need support).

Zoom  Teams
Video meetings Yes Yes
Record meetings Yes, to the cloud and locally Yes, to the Cloud only via Stream*
Screen share Yes, including whiteboard and annotation Yes, whiteboard and annotation through Whiteboard* and PowerPoint*
Polling Yes Yes, Forms or Poll Everywhere*
Share files Yes, via the in-meeting chat Yes, via Files or Class Notebooks
Breakout rooms Yes Yes
Chat during meetings Yes Yes
Chat outside of meetings Yes, via Zoom desktop app* Yes
Collaborate on documents  No Yes
Persistent workspace No Yes
Integrated with UVACollab Yes No
UVA support Extensive Limited

*separate app

Zoom

Technical Considerations

  • Zoom provides a video conference platform that is easy to use and reliable.
  • The instructor is able to control the settings of the meeting and decide who can speak when.
  • It is integrated with UVACollab

Pedagogical Considerations

  • It provides a limited set of tools for engagements (such as breakout rooms and reactions), but it is primary conducive to a learning environment where one person speaks at a time, such as in a lecture. If your style of teaching is focused on straightforward content delivery (lecture) and limited interaction, Zoom can enable you to speak virtually to students in a virtual mimicry of the classroom.
  • Its tools for collaboration are limited and it requires other platforms to do things like collaborate, share documents, and submit assignments.

Microsoft Teams

Technical Considerations

  • Enables most of the functionality of Zoom and UVACollab in one integrated platform that is designed for group collaboration.
  • Includes additional functionality: e.g. multiple channels for different groups/units, collaborative documents, embedded course content (e.g. videos, hyperlinks, PDFs, PowerPoint), embedded tabs for external
  • It is not integrated with UVACollab.
  • There are some limitations, including lack of robust internal polling or discussion functionality, and a gradebook that does not sync with SIS.

Pedagogical Considerations

  • Creates a cohesive learning environment that can incorporate in-class and out-of-class activities and resources in one persistent space.
  • Enables synchronous and asynchronous collaboration in multiple formats.
  • Houses teaching materials, assignments, assessments, video recordings, activities, and conversation threads in one platform that is more intuitive for students.

0 Comments

Add your comment

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Previous Article Self-Guided intro to "Tests and Quizzes"
Next Article Self-Guided intro to Zoom